The first function of the founders of nations, after the founding itself, is to devise a set of true falsehoods about origins – a mythology – that will make it desirable for nationals to continue to live under common authority, and, indeed, make it impossible for them to entertain contrary thoughts– Forrest McDonald (E Pluribus Unum)
Well, the content for the entire month of every October will be paranormal, so expect to have your mind blown away and all of your beliefs about reality shattered FOREVER!
The first few hundred books that I read when I began my personal development journey were of two categories. Self- help (I hate that word too) and spiritual books like Wayne Dyer and Neale Donald Walsch.
Being a typical Aries I would eventually grow tiresome of reading about the same topics in the same niche every time so I decided to veer off the path a little.
Venturing into the metaphysical section I was eager to read books on psychic phenomena, dream interpretation, divination, esoteric studies, quantum physics and various religious books other than Christianity.
Then, somewhere along the way I was introduced to Conspiracy theory books, ( I hate that word too) I prefer alternative viewpoint myself.
Well, I soon found myself getting hooked on topics like alternative/ hidden history, esoteric knowledge, secret societies and from there I began to go down the proverbial rabbit hole, going further and further down the hole discovering more and more about this world that I didn’t know existed.
Well, until now.
So for today I wrote a short post about one topic that you probably weren’t aware of .
Without further ado read ahead.
Was The American Constitution Only Written For The 39 Signatories
There are researchers who claim that the Constitution does not apply to the American people. Their claim is that the Constitution only applies to the 39 signatories and their successors.
David Parker-Williams, an American researcher who studied this subject for a long time discusses something called “capitonym”, a term that describes words that change their meaning, even their pronunciation, when they are capitalized.
One example would be china and China. One means cups and saucers and the other is a country. The point is that capitalization could change the meaning of a word.
Here is what David says in this relation to the US Constitution:
So, in the original Constitution … why did “they” capitalize the “P” in “People?”
Because the meaning was changed to a specific “People”. Thirty-nine to be exact.
It is not that someone has hidden this… the average folks aren’t looking and paying attention.
The preamble (“Pre” – in front and “amble” -to walk)… a statement that “walks in front of something” to define its purpose…that preamble told everyone: we do this “ to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”
Not everyone’s posterity only theirs.
“They” told everyone plainly.
So does this mean that the rest of US citizens are not really citizens of the US at all?
Are we technically free of the law of the land since we are not legally bound to it?
David looks at the straw-man arena from a different angle to most other researchers in the field. He doesn’t take the route of Common law/Statute law and says that this is a diversion from what people really need to do.
Here is what David has to say about getting out of the legalized contract:
Once in, there is a way out, but it is not as easy as what is being said (by the alleged gurus); because those saying it start from a false premise that “we the (little) people are free.
They say this without considering the obligations of the contracts that they voluntarily signed.
Once in as a US citizen, the only way out, is “out” as in all the way out. One must seek a new status.
In case law it states “the only way to divest oneself of US citizenship is to voluntarily undergo a naturalization process in a foreign (nation)/state”.
Until then, they have NO Rights, because; whether by fraud, misrepresentation, or artifice they “went into the contract” voluntarily, and they are in the United States.
I can’t see how being duped into contracting through fraud and misrepresentation can constitute doing it “voluntarily” though.
How about you?
Michel Tsarion – The Constitution Con
The US Constitution was created on September 17, 1787, and ratified behind closed doors on June 21, 1788. Thirty nine of the fifty five delegates attending the Philadelphia Convention signed the document. Their con job is evident from the very first line penned. Legally, the “People” mentioned are not sovereign beings, but willing slaves who have been granted the illusion of freedom.
From an occult point of view the Constitution was ratified on an Atonist festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification – June 21st – is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.
Such a tyrannical future where property rights would be ignored, where a massive standing army would lurk unchallengeable, where Congressmen would hold office for life, where ruinous treaties would be commonplace, where Presidential powers would make Nero jealous, where gold and silver would vanish from circulation to be replaced by the worthless “notes” of a private banking conglomeration, where the States would be reduced to mere administrative departments of the feds, and where the grasp of taxation would actually reach into the common laborer’s paycheck – all this was too fantastic to be even theoretically contemplated during the ratification debates – Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
Where a majority are united by a common sentiment, and have an opportunity, the rights of the minor party become insecure. In a republican government the majority, if united, have always an opportunity. The only remedy is to enlarge the sphere and thereby divide the community into so great a number of interests and parties that, in the first place, a majority will not be likely, at the same moment, to have a common interest separate from that of the whole, or of the minority; and, in the second place, that, in case they should have such an interest, they may not be so apt to unite in the pursuit of it – (Elliot’s Debates, Vol. 5)
The con is evident from the Constitution’s Preamble, as we said. In fact the “People” referred to are notcitizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution.
The term “We the People” denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the “United States of America” – the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line.
Read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
This is what the Preamble subtextually infers:
WE THE RULING ARISTOCRACY, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution FOR THE SLAVES WITHOUT RIGHTS, UNDER OUR FEDERAL CONTROL.
Because “People” is capitalized it is a proper noun referring to a specific body of people – Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)